Top 5 Success Metrics (Measure product value and business impact) in Product Management and Project management
Success Metrics (Measure product value and business impact)
High Importance:
Customer Adoption Rate – % of target users actively using the feature/product.
Revenue Impact – Revenue growth, cost savings, or ROI tied to the release.
User Satisfaction (NPS/CSAT) – Feedback scores from end-users/stakeholders.
Defect Escape Rate – Critical bugs found post-launch (indicates quality gaps).
Conversion Rates – For key user flows (e.g., sign-ups, purchases).
( To remember.
I signed up to Swiggy ( but also zomato) -- conversion,
I use both - good adoption,
I use Swiggy fewer times than zomato- revenue ,
I didn't find a bug -- defect,
I get better resolution to issues from customer care in Zomato vs swiggy- satisfaction level is better in zomato)
========
Project Metrics (Measure delivery efficiency and team performance)
(Total 5)
A. High Importance:
On-Time Delivery Rate – % of releases/sprints meeting committed deadlines.
Sprint Velocity – Story points completed per sprint (track consistency, not speed).
Scope Creep Rate – % of unplanned work added mid-sprint/release.
Critical Risk Resolution Time – Time taken to mitigate top risks.
Examples
Few in brief:
Eg 1 – Healthcare SaaS Platform Launch:
During the final testing phase, a compliance risk related to HIPAA data encryption was flagged. The risk was resolved in 3 working days after immediate escalation to the security and legal teams. The quick turnaround helped avoid a potential go-live delay and reputational damage.
Eg 2 – E-commerce Mobile App Update:
A performance bottleneck was discovered in the checkout module that could cause timeouts during peak sales hours. The issue was logged as a critical risk. It was mitigated in 48 hours by reallocating senior backend engineers and optimizing the database queries.
B. Medium importance:
Burndown/Burnup Charts – Progress toward sprint/release goals.
EdTech Course Builder Feature (Burnup chart):
The burnup chart illustrated that while the team’s completed work increased steadily, the scope also grew mid-sprint due to stakeholder-requested changes. This visualization clearly exposed scope creep and helped initiate a discussion to move some features to the next sprint.
Comments
Post a Comment